Update 2013: NZ Primary Care Handbook 2012
New CVDRA equation available 2014
Management options discussed with all patients
Increasingly graded approach to the intensity of management
Combined risk replaces absolute risk
Overarching principle is that intensity of interventions proportional to size of estimated cvd risk.
Recommendations
-
All patients benefit from healthier lifestyles
-
Most patients with 5yr combined risk \<10% well managed without drug treatment
-
5yr CVD risk 10-20%
-
discussion about benefits and harms of BP lowering and lipid lowering drugs
-
shared decision to initiate:
-
lifestyle only
-
add BP dec.
-
add lipid lowering
-
ALL
-
-
Most patients with CVD risk >20% benefit significantly from both BP and lipid lowering and antiplatelet drugs + intensive non-pharmacological interventions
-
Patients at any age with significant individual risk factors need to have them managed
Cardiovascular disease risk assessment
-
Shared treatment decisions form basis of managing cardiovascular risk
-
Take into account:
-
individuals estimated 5yr combined CVD risk
-
magnitude of absolute benefits
-
harms of intervention
-
Intervention
-
Lifestyle
-
diet
-
exercise
-
smoking
-
-
lipid lowering
-
blood pressure lowering
-
antiplatelet medication
-
diabetes care
-
medication after:
-
myocardial infarction
-
stroke
-
other cardiovascular events
-
Recommended age to offer cardiovascular risk assessment
-
Men 45/women 55
- Asymptomatic without known risk factors:
-
Men 35yo/women 45yo
-
Maori/pacific/indo-asian:
-
with other known risk factors or high risk of developing diabetes
-
Family history risk factors:
-
Diabetes in 1st-degree relative
-
Premature CAD or ischaemic stroke in a first-degree relative (male \<55yrs, female \<65yrs)
-
-
-
Personal history risk factors
-
People who smoke (or who have quit in last 12 months)
-
Gestational diabetes, PCOS
-
Prior hypertension (BP >160/90)
-
Prior TC:HDL ratio >= 7
-
BMI >30 or truncal obesity: >100cm men, >90cm women
-
eGFR \<60
-
-
-
Annually from time of diagnosis
-
DM
-
type 1
-
type 2
-
-
-
It is reasonable to not see face-face if things have not significantly changed
-
if CVRA \<5% review/reassess within the next 10 years
What to measure and record for CVRA
History
-
Age
-
Gender
-
Ethnicity
-
Smoking status (if stopped \<12/12 record as smoker)
Family History
-
Premature coronary heart disease/ischaemic stroke first deg. rel
-
male \<55yo
-
female \<65
-
-
Type 2 DM
-
Genetic lipid disorder
Past medical history
-
Past history of cardiovascular disease
-
MI
-
PCI
-
CABG
-
Angina
-
Ischaemic stroke
-
TIA
-
peripheral vascular disease
-
-
Genetic lipid disorder
-
familial hypercholesterolaemia
-
Familial defective ApoB
-
Familial combined dyslipidaemia
-
Measure
-
Lipids
-
single non-fasting TC:HDL ratio used in calculation
-
If TC or TC:HDL >8mmol/l repeat the test
- There is a possibility of genetic lipid disorder if TC>8 and/or strong FHx of premature CAD
-
-
HBA1c
- Use single non-fasting HbA1c to screen for diabetes at same time as lipid profile
-
Blood pressure
-
Sitting BP measurement
-
2 seated BP measurements recommended for initial risk assessment
- one each arm
-
use appropriate cuff
-
Small adult (22-26cm = 24cm)
-
Adult (27-34cm = 30cm)
-
Large adult 35-44cm (38)
-
Adult thigh (45-52)
-
-
-
BMI
-
Doesn’t:
-
distinguish between fat and lean mass
-
ethnic differences
-
measure actual body fat or provide information about distribution of body fat
-
-
-
Waist circumference
- midway between lower rib margin and iliac crest to nearest 1cm
Diabetes
-
Date of diagnosis
-
Type of diabetes
-
HBA1c
-
Urine albumin: creatinine (ACR)
-
eGFR and history of renal disease
Atrial fibrillation - confirmed on ECG
-
Echocardiogram
-
Past history of:
-
stroke
-
TIA
heart failure
-
rheumatic or mitral heart disease
-
Estimating 5yr cardiovascular risk - the charts:
Very high risk groups: >20%
-
Previous CVD event
-
Some genetic lipid disorders (see above)
-
Diabetes with overt nephropathy
-
ACR 30mg/mmol
-
urinary albumin 200mg/L
-
-
Diabetes with other renal disease causing renal impairment
- eGFR \<60
People aged 35-74 yrs
-
Calculate 5yr risk
-
AF confers additional risk over and above
-
These groups moved up one risk group cateogry (5%):
-
FHx of premature CAD or ischaemic stroke in 1st deg. relative (M \<55yo, F \<65)
-
Maori, pacific people or indo-asian peoples
-
Diabetes with microalbuminuria, persistent proteinuria, or DM for 10yrs, or HbA1c consistently >64mmol/L
-
People aged \<35yrs with known risk factors
-
All calculations outside age ranges of Framingham equation are approximate but can be useful
-
Age \<35:
-
calculate risk as if 35yrs old
-
Low HDL\<0.7mmol/L - because of risk of genetic lipid disorder
-
Known familial dyslipidaemias or suspected genetic lipid disorders
-
Type 1 DM, Type 2 DM with microalbuminauria, Type 2 DM of long duration (10yrs)
-
People aged >75yo; depending on other risk factors
-
calculate risk as if were 65-74yo
-
evidence for lipid lowering in the elderly limited as primary prevention
-
harms vs benefit analysis/discussion more difficult
-
Older people gain similar relative benefit from cholesterol lowering
-
but are more likely to have absolute benefit
-
much higher pre-treatment of cardiovascular risk
-
-
Cormorbidity is more common
-
time available to derive benefit will be shorter
-
patients' expectations should be taken into account
Note: risk charts may underestimate risk in:
-
single risk factors:
-
TC >= 8mmol/L
-
TC:HDL ratio >= 8
-
BP consistently above 170/100 mmHg
-
-
risk may be higher than assumed 5yr CVD risk of ≥15%
Follow-up intervals
-
\<5%
- 10yrs
-
2013:
- all others: As soon as practicle
-
5-10%
- 5yrs
-
10-15%
- 2 years
-
≥ 15%, DM or on lipid/BP lowering
- annual
-
DM/medications/smoking cessation treatment/intensive lifestyle advice
- 3mo until controlled then 6mo
Microalbuminuria definition
excretion between 30mg and 300mg of albumin a day in the urine.
less than 30mg is insignificant.
more than 300mg is albuminauria or macroalbuminuria.
Cardiovascular risk factor management goals
-
All treatment decisions should be informed by an individual's estimated 5 year combined CVD risk
-
discussion of magnitude of benefits and type and likelihood of potential harms
-
People will have their own risk thresholds
Aim of treatment is to reduce CVD risk
-
The order in which to start interventions should take into account :
-
individual risk factor levels
- it is easier to modify risk that is very abN than one that is moderatley abN
-
potential sie effects
-
other concurrent illness
-
compliance
-
personal preference
-
Blood pressure lowering and statin medications work independently to lower risk
-
Either or both will be effective depending on the combined clinical risk
-
"Your heart forecast"(http://www.heartfoundation.org.nz)
Management guidance:
-
\<10%
-
lifestyle advice
-
evidence of benefit from antiHTN and statin unclear
-
offer CVD risk 5-10yrs
-
-
10-20%
-
specific individualised lifestyle advice
-
diet
-
physical activity
-
smoking cessation
-
-
medications
-
good evidecne demonstrating benefti in this group
-
absolute beneftis smaller at lower levels of combined risk
- increasing benefit for those with higher
-
shared decision making
-
-
follow-up
-
as clinically indicated
- more intensive focus for higher combined risk patients
-
if not on drug treatment
-
1yr 15-20%
-
2yr 10-15%
-
-
-
-
>20%
-
intensive lifestyle
-
strong evidence for:
-
BP-lowering
-
statins
-
antiplatelet therapy
-
-
review annually or as clinically indicated
-
-
with established CVD
- initially monitor @ 3mo then as clinically indicated
Medication Management
Blood pressure lowering
-
BP> 170/100 BP lowering treatment usually recommended irrespective of the combined CVD risk
-
\<170/100 informed by combined cardiovascular risk
Between 10-20%
-
discuss benefits and risks
-
lifestyle modification
-
aim is to achieve moderate blood pressure reduction to reduce combined risk -> no target
>20%
-
strongly recommended
-
caution if BP \<130/80